<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Really Super Mega Epic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A Futuristic Post-Apocalyptic Nuclear Sci-Fi Warrior Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:56:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Top 123 Books You Should Read so You&#8217;re Not an Idiot by gizzy</title>
		<link>http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/2009/10/21/the-top-123-books-you-should-read-so-youre-not-an-idiot/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>gizzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/?p=666#comment-754</guid>
		<description>Einstein was not right about shortcoming of Quantum Theory. Quantum theory has been tested to it&#039;s limits and it is applicable to situations where gravitational fields are not too strong - string theory might or might not reconcile this fact. Unfortunately we cannot rationalise quantum realism in the same way as we do rationalise phenomena that occur on human scale - it is impossible. Quantum physics is deterministic - it predicts quantum phenomena to high degree - otherwise I would not be able to perform neutron experiments and predict properties of materials.
There is no classical explanation to EPR and wave-particle duality. This is a fact. This is how universe works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Einstein was not right about shortcoming of Quantum Theory. Quantum theory has been tested to it&#8217;s limits and it is applicable to situations where gravitational fields are not too strong &#8211; string theory might or might not reconcile this fact. Unfortunately we cannot rationalise quantum realism in the same way as we do rationalise phenomena that occur on human scale &#8211; it is impossible. Quantum physics is deterministic &#8211; it predicts quantum phenomena to high degree &#8211; otherwise I would not be able to perform neutron experiments and predict properties of materials.<br />
There is no classical explanation to EPR and wave-particle duality. This is a fact. This is how universe works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Silver Lining by thekingpin68</title>
		<link>http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/662/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>thekingpin68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/?p=662#comment-751</guid>
		<description>&#039;I mean, think about it. If you don’t believe in Jesus, and if your morals are largely influenced by popular culture, then you have no reason to think that homosexuality is not okay. If that’s the case, then why wouldn’t you participate in something that could help an “oppressed” group of people gain social acceptance?&#039;

Yes, many people are philosophical followers.

David, I look through the web for &#039;stars&#039; occasionally and I wonder if some are saved, or were saved prior to death.  Sometimes a little evidence here and there shows up for the positive.

Hey I realize links won&#039;t post here (have tried before) but on my thekingpin68 site there is a link and one can see their blog rating as in G, PG, R, NC-17 etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;I mean, think about it. If you don’t believe in Jesus, and if your morals are largely influenced by popular culture, then you have no reason to think that homosexuality is not okay. If that’s the case, then why wouldn’t you participate in something that could help an “oppressed” group of people gain social acceptance?&#8217;</p>
<p>Yes, many people are philosophical followers.</p>
<p>David, I look through the web for &#8217;stars&#8217; occasionally and I wonder if some are saved, or were saved prior to death.  Sometimes a little evidence here and there shows up for the positive.</p>
<p>Hey I realize links won&#8217;t post here (have tried before) but on my thekingpin68 site there is a link and one can see their blog rating as in G, PG, R, NC-17 etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Top 123 Books You Should Read so You&#8217;re Not an Idiot by thekingpin68</title>
		<link>http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/2009/10/21/the-top-123-books-you-should-read-so-youre-not-an-idiot/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>thekingpin68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/?p=666#comment-750</guid>
		<description>Hello David,

I have not read most of those.  I suppose I have been reading too much in Theology, Philosophy of Religion and Biblical Studies, and then throw in the odd comic.;)

God bless, my friend.

Yayy

103. (read) The Bible

Went through this for my PhD

98. The Origin of Species, by Charles Darwin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello David,</p>
<p>I have not read most of those.  I suppose I have been reading too much in Theology, Philosophy of Religion and Biblical Studies, and then throw in the odd comic.;)</p>
<p>God bless, my friend.</p>
<p>Yayy</p>
<p>103. (read) The Bible</p>
<p>Went through this for my PhD</p>
<p>98. The Origin of Species, by Charles Darwin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Top 123 Books You Should Read so You&#8217;re Not an Idiot by MikeS</title>
		<link>http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/2009/10/21/the-top-123-books-you-should-read-so-youre-not-an-idiot/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/?p=666#comment-748</guid>
		<description>Einstein was right about the shortcomings of Quantum Mechanics and so therefore String Theory is also the incorrect approach. As an alternative to Quantum Theory there is a new theory that describes and explains the mysteries of physical reality. While not disrespecting the value of Quantum Mechanics as a tool to explain the role of quanta in our universe. This theory states that there is also a classical explanation for the paradoxes such as EPR and the Wave-Particle Duality. The Theory is called the Theory of Super Relativity.
This theory is a philosophical attempt to reconnect the physical universe to realism and deterministic concepts. It explains the mysterious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Einstein was right about the shortcomings of Quantum Mechanics and so therefore String Theory is also the incorrect approach. As an alternative to Quantum Theory there is a new theory that describes and explains the mysteries of physical reality. While not disrespecting the value of Quantum Mechanics as a tool to explain the role of quanta in our universe. This theory states that there is also a classical explanation for the paradoxes such as EPR and the Wave-Particle Duality. The Theory is called the Theory of Super Relativity.<br />
This theory is a philosophical attempt to reconnect the physical universe to realism and deterministic concepts. It explains the mysterious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Silver Lining by David</title>
		<link>http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/662/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/?p=662#comment-746</guid>
		<description>When I die, people will remember me however they want to. Some people will remember the mistakes I made, while others will remember my successes.

I don&#039;t agree with the message or the content of Brokeback Mountain. However, if there was no public evidence that Heath Ledger knew Jesus, then I have to go by my best assumptions. Really, I shouldn&#039;t be judging him at all, but if I had to make a ruling about his involvement in that movie, then I would say he was probably doing it in ignorance, with good intentions.

I mean, think about it. If you don&#039;t believe in Jesus, and if your morals are largely influenced by popular culture, then you have no reason to think that homosexuality is not okay. If that&#039;s the case, then why wouldn&#039;t you participate in something that could help an &quot;oppressed&quot; group of people gain social acceptance?

I&#039;m not defending the movie, and I&#039;m not defending homosexuality (for my personal views on it, go here: http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/2008/04/23/the-bible-and-homosexuality/). What I am saying is that even though the movie is bad, and even if Heath&#039;s involvement in it was not a good thing, if he had no reason to think it was bad, then I choose to give him the benefit of the doubt. Sort of a Luke 23:34 mentality.

Heath Ledger seemed like a nice guy to me. He probably thought he was doing a good thing. That&#039;s no excuse - lots of evil has been wrought with the best intentions. It&#039;s just a hope. I hope he was as nice as he seemed, and I hope that this movie is inspiring and good - maybe it can be a counterweight against the bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I die, people will remember me however they want to. Some people will remember the mistakes I made, while others will remember my successes.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree with the message or the content of Brokeback Mountain. However, if there was no public evidence that Heath Ledger knew Jesus, then I have to go by my best assumptions. Really, I shouldn&#8217;t be judging him at all, but if I had to make a ruling about his involvement in that movie, then I would say he was probably doing it in ignorance, with good intentions.</p>
<p>I mean, think about it. If you don&#8217;t believe in Jesus, and if your morals are largely influenced by popular culture, then you have no reason to think that homosexuality is not okay. If that&#8217;s the case, then why wouldn&#8217;t you participate in something that could help an &#8220;oppressed&#8221; group of people gain social acceptance?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not defending the movie, and I&#8217;m not defending homosexuality (for my personal views on it, go here: <a href="http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/2008/04/23/the-bible-and-homosexuality/)" rel="nofollow">http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/2008/04/23/the-bible-and-homosexuality/)</a>. What I am saying is that even though the movie is bad, and even if Heath&#8217;s involvement in it was not a good thing, if he had no reason to think it was bad, then I choose to give him the benefit of the doubt. Sort of a Luke 23:34 mentality.</p>
<p>Heath Ledger seemed like a nice guy to me. He probably thought he was doing a good thing. That&#8217;s no excuse &#8211; lots of evil has been wrought with the best intentions. It&#8217;s just a hope. I hope he was as nice as he seemed, and I hope that this movie is inspiring and good &#8211; maybe it can be a counterweight against the bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Silver Lining by Rick b</title>
		<link>http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/662/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/?p=662#comment-745</guid>
		<description>Sadly Their is no evidence he knew Jesus, so I cannot remember him as a hero. Also I never saw the movie, broke back mountain. But while he did a good job as the joker, I will always think of him as the gay cowboy. Rick b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly Their is no evidence he knew Jesus, so I cannot remember him as a hero. Also I never saw the movie, broke back mountain. But while he did a good job as the joker, I will always think of him as the gay cowboy. Rick b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Knowing is Everything? by Mon</title>
		<link>http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/knowing-is-everything/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Mon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/?p=405#comment-744</guid>
		<description>I liked it. &amp; I certainly do like Nicolas Cage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked it. &amp; I certainly do like Nicolas Cage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You think I&#8217;m joking, but I&#8217;m not. by sherif</title>
		<link>http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/you-think-im-joking-but-im-not/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>sherif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/?p=417#comment-743</guid>
		<description>goood</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>goood</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Foot Clan&#8230; ATTACK!!! by Phil</title>
		<link>http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/2009/04/05/foot-clan-attack/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/?p=566#comment-741</guid>
		<description>hello there.

Im wondering if you know anything about how or wherethe Foot Clan Ninja costume you were fitted in was made. I need to get a costume to attend a halloween party in October.

please get back to me at sharp_shooter78@hotmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello there.</p>
<p>Im wondering if you know anything about how or wherethe Foot Clan Ninja costume you were fitted in was made. I need to get a costume to attend a halloween party in October.</p>
<p>please get back to me at <a href="mailto:sharp_shooter78@hotmail.com">sharp_shooter78@hotmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You think I&#8217;m joking, but I&#8217;m not. by simran</title>
		<link>http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/you-think-im-joking-but-im-not/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>simran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomoredarkness.wordpress.com/?p=417#comment-740</guid>
		<description>i luv dhoom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i luv dhoom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
